Thomas Becket: Murdered in the Cathedral

Thomas Becket was born in 1118, in Cheapside, London, who despite being the son of a prosperous Norman merchant was by no means of noble birth and he spent much of his formative years mixing with the common people where he earned a respect for the Saxon peasant and learned the language of the street.

He also enjoyed the manly pursuits of hunting and hawking, could wield a sword, and knew how to use his fists.

He was to prove on more than one occasion that he could cope with the rough and tumble of life and he seemed an unlikely candidate to become England’s first Christian Martyr, rather a life of comfortable if somewhat lively obscurity appeared to beckon.

His education, though often good, was somewhat piecemeal, and his father was never so wealthy that Thomas did not have to go out and earn his living but his family did have connections and through these his father was able to secure a number of important posts for him.

Early on the young Thomas who had taken the time to study the law displayed a flair for administration and appeared to understand the minutiae of financial accounting, a rare asset indeed. His talents were to guarantee that he was a man going places.

Becket’s administrative abilities earned him a place in the household of Theobald Bec, the Archbishop of Canterbury, where a major part of his duties were to represent the Archbishop abroad and he resided both in Italy and France where he took to studying Canon Law.

He had never before considered the religious life and as a man who enjoyed good food and wine and liked to dress to impress it seems unlikely that he did so now, but it is a measure of his character that he determined to understand in full measure the tasks set before him.

henry ii z

In January 1155, Theobald recommended Thomas to the young King Henry II as Lord Chancellor and Henry who was aware of Becket’s reputation in financial matters, was happy to oblige.

He was not to be disappointed and Becket flourished in his new role using his connections within the clergy to ensure that few failed to pay their taxes on time and his deep understanding of the law and how it could be manipulated saw the revenue from land assets increase considerably.

The King’s coffers were soon overflowing, and Henry could not have been more impressed with his new Chancellor who knew how to squeeze a penny and unburdened him of the administrative minutiae that so bored him.

These two very different men soon became good friends, and all who saw them together could see that their relationship was a close and special one. Indeed, they were rarely out of each other’s company with the tall, slim, pale faced, studious Becket, always calm and self-assured being about the only man who could keep pace with the stocky, powerfully built, hyper-active Henry, ten years his junior.

They drank together, hunted together, and they whored together, and it seemed to those at Court that they were inseparable.

In 1162, Theobald died and the obvious candidate to replace him as Archbishop of Canterbury was Thomas Becket. Even though, he had not yet been ordained as a priest. This oversight was soon rectified and he was ordained on 2 July and the following day his appointment as Archbishop became official.

Henry was delighted, Becket less so, and prior to his appointment he had warned the King that come his appointment:

“Our friendship will turn to hate.”

Henry now had every reason to believe that he had found the man to deal with the incessant conflict between secular and temporal authority. After all, he was no monk, no quiet man of the cloisters but rather a heavy-drinking, hard-living, streetwise man of the people. But he was also a man who took his responsibilities seriously.

Once he became Archbishop he very quickly transformed himself into the ascetic man of the cloth and unknown to both his associates and the King he had already taken to sleeping on a stone floor and wearing a hair-shirt under his expensive clerical vestments.

With his man in place, Henry now decided that he wanted to assert his authority over the Church once and for all.

becket2 with knights x

On 30 January 1164, he invited the Nobility and the leading members of the Clergy to an Assembly at Clarendon Palace where he sought to weaken the ties that the Church had to Rome, diminish the power of the Pope, restrict clerical independence, and make the clergy conform to his will.

There was also at this time a great deal of controversy over the role of Church Courts in society.

Any member of the clergy, or even those with loose ties to the Church regardless of the severity of their crime, had the right to be tried before a Church Court. Unable by law to inflict the harsher physical punishments, the Church would often merely pass sentences of spiritual redemption.

Henry and his Nobles wanted the miscreants who often included murderers and even those of traitorous intent handed over to the Royal Courts for sentencing, and he was successful in bringing most of the clergy into line but to his surprise he found Becket not to be one of them.

Whereas the clergy endorsed the changes, Becket condemned them and refused to sign the document that would have seen their implementation.

His decision flew in the face of the majority of the Church he was supposed to represent but then he had never been popular with the greater part of the clergy who considered him a commoner, coarse in his language, and brusque in his manner – an upstart parvenu who had been promoted way beyond his station.

Now this man who’d had little formal religious training dared to preach to them on issues of Canon Law.

Henry tried to use their friendship to persuade Becket to agree to the Constitutions of Clarendon and it appeared that he had managed to do so, verbally at least, but he still refused to sign the document required to bring it into law.

Henry, who was always on a short-fuse, now ordered Becket to appear at Northampton Castle on 8 October 1164 to face charges of malfeasance in his Office as Lord Chancellor, and for having contempt for Royal Authority. Becket denied all the charges and the exchanges between him and his accusers became ever more heated and using language rarely heard at Court he abused those who spoke against calling them pimps, whore-mongers and bastards.

He was nevertheless found guilty and fearing for his life, that night an associate of his procured a horse and together, while most slept, they fled.

No longer able to remain in England, Becket and a few friends took ship for France.

Seizing upon a political opportunity to embarrass his rival Henry, the French King Louis VII, guaranteed the exiled and destitute Becket protection.

Becket and his followers now established an effective Government-in-Exile at the Cistercian Abbey of Potigny, while in England, Henry relentlessly persecuted anyone known to favour Becket.

In return, Becket threatened to excommunicate the King’s friends, and at one point even the King himself.

Eventually, in 1170, in order to end a dispute that was damaging the unity of Christendom, Pope Alexander III intervened to try and arbitrate some kind of reconciliation. In the meantime, Henry had decided to crown his eldest son, also named Henry, his successor whilst he still reigned.

The Coronation took place in June 1170 and was presided over by Roger Pont L’Eveque, the Archbishop of York.

This was a serious breach of protocol as it was only within the remit of the Archbishop of Canterbury to preside at Coronations. Despite this deliberate attempt on the part of the King to undermine the authority of his senior cleric, Henry and Becket were to meet for one last time at Freteval in France.

becket2 with king x

The occasion was fraught with tension but this was relieved somewhat when Becket dismounted from his horse and knelt in supplication before the King who overwhelmed with emotion grabbed his old friend by his arms and raised him to his feet. The two of them then sat beneath a tree and spoke to each other alone for some hours.

To those present it seemed as if these two powerful men, once inseparable, but more recently implacable enemies, were reconciled once more. But the dispute between the King and his Archbishop had been as personal as it had political. Henry believed he had been betrayed by the man he had brought to stand alongside him, had broken bread with, and had elevated to the highest position in the land other than his own. Becket similarly mistrusted the motives of the man he had got to know so well and believed he had been used to do his bidding over and above the Will of God thereby imperilling his soul.

Bad blood between close friends is rarely purified.

Before they parted, Henry remarked that he hoped to see his old friend again soon. To which Becket replied:

“Something tells me that we will never see one another again.”

Henry, taken aback snapped angrily:

“Do you take me as a traitor then?”

To which Becket responded:

“Heaven Forbid!”

Becket returned to England in the late autumn of 1170, to little fanfare or public rejoicing and responded to his frosty reception by excommunicating L’Eveque and those others within the Church hierarchy he knew to be his enemies.

L’Eveque, Gilbert Foliot, the Bishop of London, and Joceline de Bohun, the Bishop of Salisbury, now all fled in high dudgeon to Henry’s Court at Bures in Normandy.

Upon hearing the news of their excommunication Henry flew into a rage.

He had believed that just as he had forgiven and compensated those who had supported Becket during their dispute, the Archbishop would likewise forgive and embrace his followers. Now that bond of trust between them that had been stretched to breaking point snapped.

One night during dinner Henry raged out loud against his frustratingly obdurate, bloody-minded, cantankerous Archbishop:

“What miserable drones and traitors have I nourished and brought up in my household, who let their Lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born cleric.”

Others reported that he also remarked – Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest!

Henry, who had always struggled to control his temper spoke rashly, and never meant for Becket to be killed. But to some of those present his words were to be taken literally.

becket2 canterbury cath x

On 29 December 1170, four knights; Reginald FitzUrse, Hugh de Morville, William de Tracy, and Richard de Breton arrived at Canterbury Cathedral.

They had been drinking heavily the night before and were likely still under the influence of alcohol but even so they stacked their weapons at the Cathedral door out of respect, but were soon angered when they were refused entry.

Informed that there were armed men outside but that the doors had been closed to them, Becket ordered them opened. It was Vespers and he would not deny his congregation entry. Neither would, as he was advised to do, run away or hide. He would continue to do God’s work.

As the knights entered most of Becket’s attendants fled but he remained performing his duties and ignoring their presence. When they told him, politely but firmly, that he must accompany them to Winchester to account for his behaviour, he denied their authority to make demands of him but informed them that they may remain if they wished.

Frustrated the knights now tried to manhandle him out of the Cathedral but Becket gave as good as he got, brushing them aside, and giving them the sharp edge of his tongue.

Humiliated by their failure to subdue the obdurate Archbishop the knights left returning shortly after their demeanour more threatening and with swords drawn. Becket was by now in the Cathedral Main Hall preparing for the Evening Service where despite their threats he continued to ignore them.

Edward Grim, a clerk who had remained concealed in the Cathedral described what happened:

becket2 being killed x

“The knights leapt suddenly upon him cutting off the crown of his head. Next he received a second blow, but still he stood firm and immovable. At the third blow he fell to his knees and elbows, offering himself a living sacrifice, and saying in a low voice “For the name of Jesus and the protection of the Church, I am ready to embrace death”. A third knight then inflicted a terrible wound as he lay prostrate. The top of Becket’s head had been severed, and as he lay dead upon the ground, his brains were scooped out and spread across the Cathedral floor. Someone then said, “Let us away knights, this fellow will arise no more.”

How Henry reacted at the news of the brutal murder of his old friend is unknown but the initial response of most of the clergy was one of rejoicing – The martinet Becket was dead!

But within months of his murder, and the discovery that despite appearances he had lived an ascetic life, he was being venerated throughout Europe as a Christian martyr.

On 12 July 1171, perhaps bowing to pressure, perhaps out of a genuine sense of guilt and grief, Henry walked barefoot to Canterbury Cathedral in an act of public penance. Once there he prostrated himself before the Shrine to Thomas Becket where he was flogged by the monks.

Over the next few years the Shrine to Saint Thomas a’ Becket was to become a significant destination for Christian pilgrims in England and across Europe.

Following the murder, the knights responsible had fled to Hugh de Morville’s Castle at Knaresborough in Yorkshire.

Henry chose not to pursue or punish them but also refused to defend them when the Pope ordered their excommunication. Instead, he encouraged them to travel to Rome to beg the Pope’s forgiveness but rather than receive absolution of their sins they were ordered to do fourteen years service in the Holy Land as penance.

None of them were to return home alive.

On 23 February 1173, at Segni in Italy, Pope Alexander III canonised Thomas Becket.

The remnants of his life now became holy and the spot where he was struck down a place of worship. Canterbury water was believed to heal the sick and to invoke his name was bring God’s blessing.

That was until 1538 when Henry VIII’s Protestant Reformation and dissolution of the monasteries saw the Shrine of Thomas a’ Becket destroyed and the further mention even of his name let alone his deeds become liable to punishment with a fine, a public flogging, or even worse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked